Nike SB vs. The Soul of Skateboarding

by The Editors on January 25, 2012

Nike Skateboarding Timeline OriginalIn his story A Chronicle of Doing It: Nike and Destruction Kyle Beachy (an assistant professor of English and Creative Writing at Chicago’s Roosevelt University) rolls through the history of Nike and skateboarding pointing out the obvious dichotomy between corporate cobbling and the core skateboarding market along the way.

Here’s a sample:

I submit that Grant Taylor is one of perhaps three skaters recognizable more by his shoe sponsor than board company. It is the same sponsor who weathered the PR nightmare of sweatshop injustice, elbowed themselves into golf and soccer, supports SOPA, and might, though they have no reason to, someday manufacture their own skateboards. Because why not. The same sponsor whose strategy will clear away the clutter of poorly- and skater-run, middling footwear companies, the inept and frail and upstart alike, acting as our free market’s grand systematic broom. Whatever Nike’s next step is, it will be, like Grant Taylor, bigger and faster. We will ignore the rubber gloves and hear the parrot’s squawk as our own. Bigger, faster, bigger, bigger, bigger.

The aforementioned quote is in fact the conclusion to the piece, but read the whole story anyway because Beachy pretty much covers every angle of the Nike vs. Core discussion and ends up where we all do: with the realization that the winning brands are the ones who do it better than everyone else. And while it sometimes sucks to admit that, it is so true that we’re almost embarrassed even mentioning it.

[Link: The Classical]

Doodoo Brown January 26, 2012 at 7:14 am

Well I find Nike no different than any other brand that is publicly owned: Volcom (PPR), Quik brands, Jarden brands, or VF Corp brands. Basically, consumers are stupid and believe marketing hype machines, and buy overpriced Chinese shit that mostly comes from the same factories. So you can bitch all day about one “core” brand or another, but unless you are supporting a private company that doesn’t have shareholders interests first, then you are wasting your breath.

An interesting question is whether or not the same amount of money would be in action sports without the big boys? Likely not. At least it means some people can make a living participating in sports they love.

Chuck Barfoot Slideshow January 26, 2012 at 9:34 am

Nothing more or less than what Thomas Frank told us back in 1997 at the TW Snow Con.

The song, as they say, remains the same.

mtkmuseum January 31, 2012 at 10:40 am

Nike is hoping to raise the water level a bit, maybe even take the whole industry up a notch. We all want to win in this game, we want to make the product better, the competition better, the market grow and give the riders tools to help them and the sports progress. Why fight it? Why stay small and hope we stay a small niche industry with no hopes for success? Nike isn’t trying to take the soul out of it, they’re trying to add some professionalism.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: